Netanyahu is interfering in the current U.S. Presidential
campaign to put into office a president who will kowtow to his faction’s agenda, namely to get the U.S.
to attack Iran to facilitate Israeli consolidation of control over the West
Bank. While U.S.
politicians remain mostly in denial about Netanyahu’s interference in the U.S.
political system and threat to U.S.
national security, former Israeli foreign minister Livni openly
criticized Netanyahu for endangering the U.S.-Israeli alliance by his
anti-Obama attitude.
Although it is impossible to distinguish with certainty the
responsibility of Washington from
that of Tel Aviv for recent acts of anti-Iranian aggression, even the
militantly right-wing website DEBKA seemed recently to be hinting that the
recently murdered Iranian nuclear scientist was killed by Israel
to provoke a U.S.-Iranian war:
By denying "absolutely" any US involvement in the killing, the administration implicitly pointed the finger at Israel, [emphasis in original] an unusual act in relations between two friendly governments, especially when both face a common issue as sensitive as a nuclear-armed Iran. Obama seemed to suspect that Israel staged the killing to torpedo yet another US secret effort to avoid a military confrontation with Iran through back channel contacts with Tehran, while the administration's extreme condemnation is seen as tying in with its all-out campaign to hold Israel back from a unilateral strike. [DEBKA 1/14/12.]
Netanyahu seems
simultaneously to be interfering in U.S. internal affairs and attempting to undermine
U.S. foreign policy in a way that directly harms U.S. national security. While neither represents
anything unique in the long, troubled U.S.-Israeli relationship, Netanyahu may
well be carrying such anti-U.S. behavior to an extreme that will finally awaken
the American public to the harm of allowing Israel to manipulate the U.S.
Ironically, Obama
has numerous natural allies in Israel for any effort to avoid the dangers of a war
with Iran, which would put Israel in a highly exposed position. The most
obvious ally for Obama is ex-Mossad chief Dagan, who has, since his recent
retirement, been on a public campaign
to warn against the belligerence of the Netanyahu faction. Perhaps no
foreign policy mistake by Obama is more difficult to comprehend than his
failure publicly to associate himself with such Israeli national security
officials as Dagan who fear that the poor judgment of Israeli political leaders
will endanger Israeli national security.
Despite having the
reputation of having been an extreme
hardline defender of Israel quite willing to fight dirty covert war, Dagan
has over the last six months made his distrust of Netanyahu’s war-mongering crystal clear. In December,
he reiterated his concern, noting, on the subject of a possible U.S. or Israeli attack on Iran:
The commotion surrounding the immediate alternative of an attack may lead the Iranians into a reality in which they are (pushed over the edge) and try to obtain nuclear capabilities as quickly as possible instead of treading rather carefully while taking the international community's demands into consideration….this situation could prove to be problematic because it may (affect the entire Middle East) in such a way that it would have security and economic-related repercussions for Israel…[Ynet News 12/19/11.]
Dagan spoke
publicly again in early January, implying that Israeli political leaders do not
pay attention to Israeli national security, specifically accusing both Israeli
defense ministers and prime ministers of ignoring IDF exercises designed to
study Israeli national security issues [Israel
National News 1/4/12].
Dagan’s calls for caution regarding Iran echo similar concerns voiced by leading U.S. national security figures, and, while
falling far short of advocating that Iran’s interests be taken into consideration,
nevertheless open the logical door to a new approach along those lines.
Defense Secretary
Leon Panetta recently made clear the threat to Israeli national security, even
to its continued existence, posed by Netanyahu’s belligerent policy of provoking tensions simultaneously with Iran and Palestinians, observing:
At this dramatic time in the Middle East, when there have been so many changes, it's not a good situation for Israel to become increasingly isolated. And that is what's happening. [The Corner Report 10/9/11.]
Former defense secretary Robert Gates also reportedly
accused Netanyahu of “endangering his
country by refusing to grapple with Israel's growing isolation and with the
demographic challenges it faces if it keeps control of the West Bank” [Haaretz
9/7/11.]
Rather than listening, Netanyahu has evidently decided not
only to dig in his heels but to attempt “regime
change” in Washington.
Netanyahu has long been confident of his ability to manipulate Washington
and with good reason, but this time he may be biting off more than he can chew.
The more openly Netanyahu
allies himself with the dishonored neo-con wing of the Republican Party that is
struggling to reinvigorate the Bush-Cheney policy of U.S.-provoked imperial
wars at a time when the U.S. is retreating from the Islamic world and
struggling to recover from its decade of foreign adventures and financial
excess, the more he opens political space for American officials who believe in
a more cautious route to U.S. national security to ally themselves with
like-minded Israeli officials.
No comments:
Post a Comment