The Israeli governing elite generally accepts without serious question a consensus opinion that Israeli security requires a hardline policy toward Iran of demanding unilateral concessions.
Might the alternative, a mutually acceptable compromise, offer an alternative path to security?
A. Could Israeli officials design a set of trade-offs that could enable both countries to move step by step toward a position of mutual security?
B. Would security based on the same rules for each side be more stable than security based on a position of Israeli strength vs. Iranian weakness?
C. What impact would such an Israeli policy have on Iranian security politics?
No comments:
Post a Comment