Attack is only half of a rational strategy, and the lesser half at that.
Defense Secretary Gates has evidently accused the White House of failing to develop a strategy on Iran 4/18/10 ]:
The fact that we don’t announce publicly our entire strategy for the world to see doesn’t mean we don’t have a strategy that anticipates the full range of contingencies — we do.
That, General Jones, does not answer the question. The job of national security officials is, I am aware, all too often perceived as anticipating “the full range of contingencies.” But that is the fireman’s attitude: be ready for whatever happens. The national security job goes far beyond passive preparation. The phrase itself implies that we are just sitting here – “we” being the most powerful and aggressive and intrusive nation on earth!
First of all, the U.S. is not just sitting – it is patrolling the Persian Gulf, madly arming Israel beyond any conceivable defensive need, constantly threatening Iran for thinking about doing things we don’t like, actively working to marginalize Iran from world affairs, and conducting economic warfare against Iran.
Second, the job of national security officials should include proactive steps to improve national security. Therefore, what the U.S. 
My objection is that the steps Washington Washington Iran Washington Iran 
The clue lies in Washington 
Further reading:
 
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment