Class war makes everything different: instead of agreement on the rules serving as the foundation for common success, society is split in two camps, with at least one trying to ruin the future of the other. If you happen to be part of the “other,” you need to know that you are under attack.
Class war makes everything different. If we are all united,
everyone may still spend most of their energy trying to get theirs first, but
we all agree on the rules, and the game is ultimately more like a picnic with a
shortage of chocolate cake than a fight to the death: everyone can win at least
a little, and everyone agrees that the best society is indeed one in which
everyone wins. If the rich get richer, they do so only so long as the poor and
the average simultaneously gain. If wars are fought, they are fought to defend
society from real threats.
A class war situation is exactly the reverse. If society is
split into two camps, haves and have-nots, with each side perceiving the game
as zero-sum, the rich do not get richer by floating on a rising tide but by
stealing what little the poor have, and the poor respond by trying to kill the
rich. Rather than trusting the rich to run the government for the good of all,
the poor concentrate on trying to dethrone the rascals. Rather than sharing to
create a stable, healthy, productive society, the rich do one of three things:
pretend the poor do not exist (the gated community strategy), keep the poor as
cannon fodder and cheap labor (the Middle Ages and Wisconsin Republican
strategy), or eliminate them (the Colombian cattle baron and Israeli strategy).
Wars are not last resort efforts to protect the society but eagerly awaited
opportunities for the rich to accelerate the process of self-enrichment; that is,
foreign wars are primarily features of the domestic civil war, with calls for “patriotism” just so much wool to be pulled over the eyes of the
man in the street, who is too busy trying to survive to give any serious
thought to politics.
The existence of elites appears inevitable in all large
modern societies. Most people simply do not have the interest to get involved,
and the minute you trust others to govern on your behalf, you create an elite.
We could of course make some simple and rather obvious legal changes to
minimize the production of elites, the most fundamental perhaps being limiting
any individual to holding office for only one term…ever. We could also institute national recall
provisions, like that currently being used to challenge Wisconsin Governor
Walker. And of course we could have a tax system that encourages everyone to
work hard by promoting the growth of the middle class, as the U.S. so
successfully did from the end of WWII (indeed, from the New Deal) until Carter
lost the tax battle to elitists in the late 1970s. But these are issues that
glaze over the eyes of most of the victims, and elitists are working very hard
to undermine education in order to keep things that way.
If all this seems complicated, the reason is that we are
educated purposefully to make us ignorant of these issues. Public education is
primarily a vehicle to instill patriotism (whose uses have already been
referred to) rather than to teach the tools for maintaining vigilance over
those to whom we delegate power. Our educational system serves our ruling
elite, not us. It is probably true that there is no better country on earth in
which to obtain a genuine education, one that will make of you a citizen armed
to protect yourself from elite abuse, but that requires effort – either go to a really good
college and spend years studying history, politics, and economics under
unusually open-minded professors or self-educate yourself by successfully
navigating the intellectual mine field of the Internet, reading things that reveal
how the world works. How one either selects the professors or negotiates the
Internet intellectual mine-field without already being an expert is another
question.
In any case, education is key, and elitists know this. Thus,
one of the clearest clues to the real intentions of politicians is their
attitude toward education. Those who strive to strengthen public education and
protect academic freedom are defenders of liberty; those who want dictatorship
(to put it bluntly – call it “rule by your betters,” if that makes you happy) will
attack public schooling, shift funds to private schools with ideological
agendas, attack teachers’ unions, and do
everything they can to subordinate university professors to political control
(e.g., curb freedom of speech for any who criticize Israel, try to end Federal
funding of Islamic studies, call anyone who speaks Russian a “commie symp”).
The first two paragraphs attempt to make the concept of
class war simple, but in practice class war is the ultimate in human duplicity
and subtlety. The most difficult challenge of winning a class war is figuring
out that you are under attack. And solid education in the social sciences is
the only microscope with sufficient resolution to reveal the initial stages of
the attack.
Do not despair, however. Eventually, the class war will
become so clear that only those determined to remain blind will be unable to
perceive it, for elites are condemned to suffering from an appetite they cannot
quench. Eventually, no matter how rich the elites become, they will bite off
one bite more than they can chew. Then, the whole social sand castle in which
they have the tower suites will dissolve, hurting themselves at least as much
as it hurts everyone else. At that point, if not sooner, you will know it is
time to fight back.
No comments:
Post a Comment